Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Submit your manuscript here

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Nursing Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobsson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Wenngren, B.-I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacobsson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Wenngren, B.-I.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Swallowing Disorders
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Outcomes of Individualized Interventions in Patients with Severe Eating Difficulties

Catrine Jacobsson

Umea University

Karin Axelsson

Umea University

Astrd Norberg

Umea University

Kjell Asplund

Umea University Hospital of Northern Sweden

Britt-Inger Wenngren

Umea University Hospital of Northern Sweden

The aim of this case study is to describe the outcomes of individualized interventions for patients with severe eating difficulties. The participants were 15 patients who had severe eating difficulties following a stroke or brain tumor and were receiving oral feeding or tube feeding. Interventions focused on training functions needed for eating, activities in eating, and discussions with the patient improvements were especially noted in eating activities, and some improvements were noted in oral movements and nutritional status. Before the interventions, none of the patients ate regular food afterward, six did, and in four patients, the feeding tube was removed The patients said eating was easier and they could eat in a safe way. Furthermore, they appreciated the attention to their experience during meals. Although the impairments were not always alleviated, the patients found means to cope with their eating difficulties.

Clinical Nursing Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 25-44 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/105477389700600104


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
West J Nurs ResHome page
S. E. Thorne, M. J. Radford, J. E. Onyskiw, and R. A. Day
A Comparative Longitudinal Study of Gastrostomy Devices in Children
West J Nurs Res, April 1, 1998; 20(2): 145 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]